4.4$12/user/moHarvest
Best for: time tracking + invoicing
Time tracking with built-in invoicing for agencies and service teams.

If Toggl Track isn't the right fit—because you need invoicing, unlimited free users, or different workflow—these time tracking alternatives offer strong options for freelancers and teams.
Read our Toggl Track review for full details on features, pricing, and pros and cons.
Who should switch and which alternative fits best.
Toggl Track is a strong default for simple time tracking and reporting; alternatives include Harvest for built-in invoicing, Clockify for unlimited free tracking, Timely for automatic tracking, Everhour for project-tool integration, and Hubstaff for remote monitoring. Harvest and Clockify are the most common switches.
Common reasons teams look for a change.
Toggl doesn't include invoicing. Harvest combines time tracking with invoicing; others export to invoicing tools.
Clockify offers unlimited free users. Teams on a tight budget may prefer Clockify.
Timely and RescueTime offer automatic or passive tracking. Different workflow from manual timers.
Editorially ranked alternatives we recommend.
4.4$12/user/moBest for: time tracking + invoicing
Time tracking with built-in invoicing for agencies and service teams.
4.3FreeBest for: unlimited free
Unlimited free time tracking for teams on a budget.
4.2From ~$11/user/moBest for: automatic tracking
AI-based automatic time tracking for knowledge workers.
4.3From ~$8.50/user/moBest for: project tool integration
Integrates inside Asana, Trello, ClickUp for project-based tracking.
4.4$4.99/user/moBest for: remote monitoring
Time tracking with optional screenshots and activity for remote teams.
Side-by-side at a glance.
| Software | Best for | Starting price | Standout feature | Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Toggl Track | simple tracking and reporting | Free tier | Ease of use; reporting | Read review |
Harvest | time tracking + invoicing | $12/user/mo | Built-in invoicing | Read review |
Clockify | unlimited free | Free | Unlimited free | Read review |
Timely | automatic tracking | From ~$11/user/mo | Automatic tracking | Read review |
Everhour | project tool integration | From ~$8.50/user/mo | PM integration | Read review |
Hubstaff | remote monitoring | $4.99/user/mo | Monitoring; GPS | Read review |
When to choose each alternative.
Best for time tracking + invoicing
Harvest adds built-in invoicing and expense tracking. For agencies and service teams that want one tool for time and billing.
Best for unlimited free
Clockify offers unlimited free time tracking. For teams that need to minimize cost while still tracking by project and client.
Best for automatic tracking
Timely uses AI to suggest and categorize time. For knowledge workers who prefer less manual timer discipline.
Best for project tool integration
Everhour lives inside Asana, Trello, ClickUp, and others. For teams that want time tracking in the same place as tasks.
Best for remote monitoring
Hubstaff adds optional screenshots, activity levels, and GPS. For remote or field teams that need oversight.
What to look for when comparing options.
Most tools use manual start/stop timers or timesheet entry. A few (e.g. Timely, RescueTime) offer automatic or passive tracking. Choose based on how your team works: explicit timers vs background activity.
If you bill by time, look for billable rates, project budgets, and export or integration with invoicing. Harvest has built-in invoicing; Toggl and Clockify focus on tracking and export to other tools.
Reports by client, project, and user matter for billing and capacity. Compare how easy it is to filter, export, and share time data.
Time trackers often plug into project management (Asana, Trello, Jira), invoicing, and payroll. Check that your stack is supported.
Remote teams that need screenshots, activity levels, or GPS should look at Hubstaff or Time Doctor. Most other tools avoid heavy monitoring—choose by policy.
Free tiers (Toggl, Clockify) suit individuals and small teams. Paid plans add features and seats. Compare per-user cost and limits at your team size.
Head-to-head comparisons to narrow your choice.
More ways to explore.
Quick answers.