Quick verdict
How these two tools differ.
Toggl Track is easier to roll out to teams that just need fast timers and high adoption. The UI is very clean, and tagging by client/project makes reporting powerful without heavy admin.
Harvest is stronger when you want tracking, expenses, and invoicing in one place. Agencies and service businesses that bill from timesheets often prefer Harvest’s built-in billing and budget views.
If you already have invoicing and accounting covered, Toggl is often the better fit; if you want to keep time and billing tightly connected, Harvest is usually the better default.
Comparison summary
Best for simple tracking
Toggl Track
Cleaner UI and lower friction if you already handle invoicing elsewhere.
Best for billing from time
Harvest
Built-in invoices and expenses tied directly to tracked hours.
Quick decision guide
Which product fits your situation.
Choose Toggl Track if:
- You already invoice from another tool and just need time tracking and reporting.
- You care most about adoption and a frictionless timer interface.
- You want granular tagging and flexible reports for internal analysis.
Choose Harvest if:
- You bill clients directly from tracked time and expenses.
- You run an agency or service business with project-based retainers or budgets.
- You prefer one tool to cover tracking, expenses, and invoices.
Ratings comparison
How we score each product.
| Category | Toggl Track | Harvest |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | 4.8 | 4.5 |
| Billing & invoicing | 3.5 | 4.6 |
| Reporting | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Integrations | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Feature comparison
Side-by-side feature check.
SupportedPartial supportNot available
| Feature | Toggl Track | Harvest |
|---|---|---|
| Core time tracking | Timers and timesheets | Timers and timesheets |
| Projects & clients | Projects, clients, and tags | Projects, clients, and tags |
| Reporting & analytics | Reports by client, project, and user | Reports by client, project, and user |
| Integrations | Project, invoicing, and accounting tools | Project, invoicing, and accounting tools |
| Invoicing & expenses | Exports to invoicing/accounting | Built-in invoices and expenses |
Pricing comparison
What to expect to pay.
Toggl Track offers a generous free tier for individuals and small teams, with paid plans adding billable rates, more granular permissions, and advanced reporting. Harvest uses straightforward per-user pricing that includes time tracking, expenses, and invoicing; there is a limited free tier for solo users.
Pros and cons
Strengths and trade-offs.
Toggl Track
Pros
- Very clean interface that’s easy for teams to adopt.
- Strong tagging and reporting for internal analysis.
- Generous free tier and competitive paid plans.
Cons
- No built-in invoicing; you still need a billing tool.
- More setup needed if you want detailed job-costing in accounting.
- Monitoring features are intentionally light—may not fit teams that want oversight.
Harvest
Pros
- Time tracking, expenses, and invoicing in one product.
- Clear project budget and billable vs non-billable reporting.
- Good fit for agencies and project-based service businesses.
Cons
- Per-user pricing can feel high as your team grows.
- UI is a bit more utilitarian than Toggl’s.
- Less appealing if you already have a strong invoicing tool.
Best for
Which tool fits your situation.
Best for teams that want lightweight tracking
Toggl Track is best when you want simple timers, strong reporting, and low-friction adoption—and you’re comfortable keeping invoicing separate.
Best for agencies that bill from timesheets
Harvest is best for agencies and service businesses that want to log hours, track expenses, and send invoices from one system.
Alternatives
Other options we review.
ClockifyUnlimited free time tracking with optional approvals and monitoring.
Read review →
EverhourDeep project tool integrations for Asana, Trello, and more.
Read review →More comparisons
Read full reviews
Dive deeper into each product.
For detailed ratings, features, and pros and cons, see our standalone reviews:
Best time tracking software guides
Find the right fit by use case or trade.
FAQs
Quick answers.