4.6Free tierToggl Track
Best for: simplicity and reporting
Simpler time tracking with strong reporting; pair with separate invoicing.

If Harvest isn't the right fit—because of cost, preference for simpler tracking, or different features—these time tracking alternatives offer strong options for agencies and service teams.
Read our Harvest review for full details on features, pricing, and pros and cons.
Who should switch and which alternative fits best.
Harvest combines time tracking with invoicing; alternatives include Toggl Track for simpler tracking and reporting, Clockify for unlimited free tracking, Everhour for project-tool integration, and Hubstaff or Timely for different workflows. Toggl and Clockify are the most common alternatives.
Common reasons teams look for a change.
Harvest is paid per user. Clockify offers unlimited free; Toggl has a generous free tier.
Toggl is lighter if you don't need built-in invoicing and use another tool for billing.
Everhour lives inside project tools; Timely offers automatic tracking.
Editorially ranked alternatives we recommend.
4.6Free tierBest for: simplicity and reporting
Simpler time tracking with strong reporting; pair with separate invoicing.
4.3FreeBest for: unlimited free
Unlimited free tracking; export or integrate for billing.
4.3From ~$8.50/user/moBest for: project integration
Time tracking inside Asana, Trello, ClickUp; billing features.
4.4$4.99/user/moBest for: monitoring
Time tracking with optional monitoring and payroll.
4.2From ~$11/user/moBest for: automatic tracking
AI-based automatic time tracking.
Side-by-side at a glance.
| Software | Best for | Starting price | Standout feature | Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Harvest | time + invoicing | $12/user/mo | Built-in invoicing | Read review |
Toggl Track | simplicity and reporting | Free tier | Ease of use; reporting | Read review |
Clockify | unlimited free | Free | Unlimited free | Read review |
Everhour | project integration | From ~$8.50/user/mo | PM integration | Read review |
Hubstaff | monitoring | $4.99/user/mo | Monitoring; GPS | Read review |
Timely | automatic tracking | From ~$11/user/mo | Automatic tracking | Read review |
When to choose each alternative.
Best for simplicity and reporting
Toggl focuses on tracking and reporting; use a separate tool for invoicing. For teams that prefer best-of-breed.
Best for unlimited free
Clockify offers unlimited free time tracking. For cost-conscious teams that can use export or integrations for billing.
Best for project integration
Everhour integrates inside Asana, Trello, ClickUp with billing features. For teams that live in a project tool.
Best for monitoring
Hubstaff adds optional monitoring and payroll. For remote teams that need oversight.
Best for automatic tracking
Timely uses AI for automatic time tracking. Different workflow from manual timers.
What to look for when comparing options.
Most tools use manual start/stop timers or timesheet entry. A few (e.g. Timely, RescueTime) offer automatic or passive tracking. Choose based on how your team works: explicit timers vs background activity.
If you bill by time, look for billable rates, project budgets, and export or integration with invoicing. Harvest has built-in invoicing; Toggl and Clockify focus on tracking and export to other tools.
Reports by client, project, and user matter for billing and capacity. Compare how easy it is to filter, export, and share time data.
Time trackers often plug into project management (Asana, Trello, Jira), invoicing, and payroll. Check that your stack is supported.
Remote teams that need screenshots, activity levels, or GPS should look at Hubstaff or Time Doctor. Most other tools avoid heavy monitoring—choose by policy.
Free tiers (Toggl, Clockify) suit individuals and small teams. Paid plans add features and seats. Compare per-user cost and limits at your team size.
Head-to-head comparisons to narrow your choice.
More ways to explore.
Quick answers.