Quick verdict
How these two tools differ.
Everhour’s value grows the more your work is driven by integrated project tools. Time fields, budgets, and reports appear directly in Asana, Trello, and other connected apps.
Harvest is more self-contained: you log time, track expenses, and send invoices from one app. Integrations exist, but the core experience is in Harvest itself.
If your team is deeply embedded in Asana/Trello, Everhour is often the better experience; if you want a central place for time and billing, Harvest is usually stronger.
Comparison summary
Best inside Asana/Trello
Everhour
Everhour’s deep integrations make time tracking feel native to your project tools.
Best for time + invoices
Harvest
Harvest combines time tracking, expenses, and invoicing in one app.
Quick decision guide
Which product fits your situation.
Choose Everhour if:
- You manage projects in Asana, Trello, or similar tools.
- You want time and budgets to live inside the tools your team already uses.
- You’re comfortable pairing time tracking with a separate invoicing or accounting tool.
Choose Harvest if:
- You want one app to handle time, expenses, and invoicing.
- You prefer a standalone time tracking and billing hub.
- You’re less concerned about deep Asana/Trello embedding.
Ratings comparison
How we score each product.
| Category | Everhour | Harvest |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded project integrations | 4.7 | 4.1 |
| Invoicing & expenses | 3.7 | 4.6 |
| Reporting | 4.4 | 4.3 |
| Pricing & value | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Feature comparison
Side-by-side feature check.
SupportedPartial supportNot available
| Feature | Everhour | Harvest |
|---|---|---|
| Core time tracking | Timers and timesheets | Timers and timesheets |
| Projects & clients | Projects, clients, and tags | Projects, clients, and tags |
| Reporting & analytics | Reports by client, project, and user | Reports by client, project, and user |
| Integrations | Project, invoicing, and accounting tools | Project, invoicing, and accounting tools |
| Deep project tool integrations | Strong Asana/Trello embedding | Project integrations; more standalone |
| Invoicing | Exports and light billing workflows | Full invoicing and expenses |
Pricing comparison
What to expect to pay.
Everhour and Harvest both charge per user per month, with tiers that add features as you go. Pricing is broadly comparable; the right choice depends more on whether you value embedded project integrations (Everhour) or built-in invoicing and expenses (Harvest).
Pros and cons
Strengths and trade-offs.
Everhour
Pros
- Excellent integrations with tools like Asana, Trello, and ClickUp.
- Budgets and reports where your team already works.
- Good reporting for project and client profitability.
Cons
- Less compelling if you don’t rely on supported project tools.
- Billing workflows may still require another invoicing tool.
- Learning curve around embedded configuration in each tool.
Harvest
Pros
- Time tracking, expenses, and invoicing in one product.
- Clear project budgets and billable vs non-billable reporting.
- Good fit for agencies and project-based teams.
Cons
- Less deeply embedded in project tools than Everhour.
- Per-user pricing adds up as your team grows.
- Reporting and integrations are solid but not as embedded as Everhour’s.
Best for
Which tool fits your situation.
Best for teams living in project tools
Everhour is best for teams that run everything through Asana, Trello, or similar tools and want time data and budgets to live there.
Best for teams that want time + billing in one app
Harvest is best for teams that want tracking, expenses, and invoicing in a central, standalone tool.
Alternatives
Other options we review.
Toggl TrackSimple cross-tool tracking with strong reports.
Read review →
ClockifyFree and flexible tracking with approvals and monitoring options.
Read review →More comparisons
Read full reviews
Dive deeper into each product.
For detailed ratings, features, and pros and cons, see our standalone reviews:
Best time tracking software guides
Find the right fit by use case or trade.
FAQs
Quick answers.