4.6Free tierToggl Track
Best for: ease and reporting
Simpler UX and stronger reporting; free tier available.

If Clockify isn't the right fit—because you want stronger reporting, invoicing, or a different workflow—these time tracking alternatives offer strong options.
Read our Clockify review for full details on features, pricing, and pros and cons.
Who should switch and which alternative fits best.
Clockify offers unlimited free tracking; alternatives include Toggl Track for ease and reporting, Harvest for built-in invoicing, Timely for automatic tracking, and Everhour or Hubstaff for different features. Toggl and Harvest are the most common alternatives.
Common reasons teams look for a change.
Toggl is often preferred for reporting and simpler interface. Teams may switch for better insights.
Harvest includes invoicing. Clockify focuses on tracking; you need another tool for billing.
Timely and Everhour offer automatic or in-context tracking.
Editorially ranked alternatives we recommend.
4.6Free tierBest for: ease and reporting
Simpler UX and stronger reporting; free tier available.
4.4$12/user/moBest for: invoicing
Time tracking with built-in invoicing.
4.2From ~$11/user/moBest for: automatic tracking
AI-based automatic time tracking.
4.3From ~$8.50/user/moBest for: project integration
Integrates inside Asana, Trello, ClickUp.
4.4$4.99/user/moBest for: monitoring
Time tracking with optional monitoring.
Side-by-side at a glance.
| Software | Best for | Starting price | Standout feature | Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Clockify | unlimited free | Free | Unlimited free | Read review |
Toggl Track | ease and reporting | Free tier | Ease of use; reporting | Read review |
Harvest | invoicing | $12/user/mo | Built-in invoicing | Read review |
Timely | automatic tracking | From ~$11/user/mo | Automatic tracking | Read review |
Everhour | project integration | From ~$8.50/user/mo | PM integration | Read review |
Hubstaff | monitoring | $4.99/user/mo | Monitoring; GPS | Read review |
When to choose each alternative.
Best for ease and reporting
Toggl offers simpler UX and strong reporting. For teams that want a more polished experience than Clockify.
Best for invoicing
Harvest adds built-in invoicing. For teams that want time and billing in one tool.
Best for automatic tracking
Timely uses AI for automatic time tracking. Different workflow from manual timers.
Best for project integration
Everhour lives inside project tools. For teams that want tracking in Asana, Trello, or ClickUp.
Best for monitoring
Hubstaff adds optional monitoring and GPS. For remote or field teams.
What to look for when comparing options.
Most tools use manual start/stop timers or timesheet entry. A few (e.g. Timely, RescueTime) offer automatic or passive tracking. Choose based on how your team works: explicit timers vs background activity.
If you bill by time, look for billable rates, project budgets, and export or integration with invoicing. Harvest has built-in invoicing; Toggl and Clockify focus on tracking and export to other tools.
Reports by client, project, and user matter for billing and capacity. Compare how easy it is to filter, export, and share time data.
Time trackers often plug into project management (Asana, Trello, Jira), invoicing, and payroll. Check that your stack is supported.
Remote teams that need screenshots, activity levels, or GPS should look at Hubstaff or Time Doctor. Most other tools avoid heavy monitoring—choose by policy.
Free tiers (Toggl, Clockify) suit individuals and small teams. Paid plans add features and seats. Compare per-user cost and limits at your team size.
Head-to-head comparisons to narrow your choice.
More ways to explore.
Quick answers.