4.2From ~$7/user/moTime Doctor
Best for: strict monitoring
Productivity and monitoring for remote teams.

If Hubstaff isn't the right fit—because you need stricter monitoring, no monitoring, or different features—these time tracking alternatives offer strong options for remote and field teams.
Read our Hubstaff review for full details on features, pricing, and pros and cons.
Who should switch and which alternative fits best.
Hubstaff combines time tracking with optional monitoring and GPS; alternatives include Time Doctor for stricter oversight, Toggl or Clockify for tracking without monitoring, and Harvest or Everhour for different workflows. Time Doctor is the closest monitoring alternative; Toggl and Clockify suit teams that don't need oversight.
Common reasons teams look for a change.
Time Doctor offers stricter productivity monitoring. Toggl and Clockify have no monitoring—tracking only.
Some teams prefer trust-based tracking. Toggl and Clockify focus on time only.
Harvest adds built-in invoicing; Hubstaff focuses on time and optional payroll.
Editorially ranked alternatives we recommend.
4.2From ~$7/user/moBest for: strict monitoring
Productivity and monitoring for remote teams.
4.6Free tierBest for: no monitoring
Simple time tracking without screenshots or activity tracking.
4.3FreeBest for: free tracking
Unlimited free tracking; no monitoring features.
4.4$12/user/moBest for: invoicing
Time tracking with built-in invoicing.
4.3From ~$8.50/user/moBest for: project integration
Time tracking inside project tools.
Side-by-side at a glance.
| Software | Best for | Starting price | Standout feature | Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hubstaff | remote monitoring and GPS | $4.99/user/mo | Monitoring; GPS | Read review |
Time Doctor | strict monitoring | From ~$7/user/mo | Strict oversight | Read review |
Toggl Track | no monitoring | Free tier | Ease of use; no monitoring | Read review |
Clockify | free tracking | Free | Unlimited free | Read review |
Harvest | invoicing | $12/user/mo | Built-in invoicing | Read review |
Everhour | project integration | From ~$8.50/user/mo | PM integration | Read review |
When to choose each alternative.
Best for strict monitoring
Time Doctor focuses on productivity and strict oversight for remote teams. Compare with Hubstaff for monitoring depth.
Best for no monitoring
Toggl offers simple time tracking without screenshots or activity tracking. For trust-based teams.
Best for free tracking
Clockify offers unlimited free tracking with no monitoring. For cost-conscious teams that don't need oversight.
Best for invoicing
Harvest adds built-in invoicing. For agencies that need time and billing in one tool.
Best for project integration
Everhour integrates inside project tools. For teams that want tracking in context.
What to look for when comparing options.
Most tools use manual start/stop timers or timesheet entry. A few (e.g. Timely, RescueTime) offer automatic or passive tracking. Choose based on how your team works: explicit timers vs background activity.
If you bill by time, look for billable rates, project budgets, and export or integration with invoicing. Harvest has built-in invoicing; Toggl and Clockify focus on tracking and export to other tools.
Reports by client, project, and user matter for billing and capacity. Compare how easy it is to filter, export, and share time data.
Time trackers often plug into project management (Asana, Trello, Jira), invoicing, and payroll. Check that your stack is supported.
Remote teams that need screenshots, activity levels, or GPS should look at Hubstaff or Time Doctor. Most other tools avoid heavy monitoring—choose by policy.
Free tiers (Toggl, Clockify) suit individuals and small teams. Paid plans add features and seats. Compare per-user cost and limits at your team size.
Head-to-head comparisons to narrow your choice.
More ways to explore.
Quick answers.